Oh well, there are plenty of other RTS%26#39; for you to enjoy...Supreme Commander is worst RTS game I ever played
The single player campaign is admittedly quite dull.
Yea, thats what they made multiplayer for. And about a million other RTS%26#39; for.
I think its the best RTS in years.Guess this proves how diverse people%26#39;s opinion%26#39;s can be :P
I%26#39;m also enjoying immensely, but I can see why people wouldn%26#39;t like it.
b/c your computer sucks.....the graphics should be good for a RTS. I can agree but b/c the gameplay gets repetative
Get a good computer to enjoy the graphics. And don%26#39;t even think about making fake statistics about how powerful your computer is and how it still plays poorly. Either that, or this just isn%26#39;t your style of RTS I guess.
i think u just suck at the game....
Like I said before. Supreme Commander appeals to a pretty specific audience: fans of Total Annihilation, and those would have been fans of TA had they played it back in '97. I still remember when Total Annihilation first came out, many people also regarded it with equal disdain as the OP. This does not mean the game is the worst RTS ever, it simply means the game doesn't appeal to people like the OP.
And I would just like people here to ease off on the OP a little.
man that game is awsome.I dont know how u think the graphics are crap, there pretty good on high, what are u running it on all the way low setting.I think this is one of the best rts games ever made, to me.
It actually does suck. I have a great computer and can run this game on pretty high settings, but it just gets boring after about 30 minutes. C %26 C 3 has more action and more fun.
[QUOTE=''d0ctorb'']It actually does suck. I have a great computer and can run this game on pretty high settings, but it just gets boring after about 30 minutes. C %26 C 3 has more action and more fun.[/QUOTE]C %26 C 3 is a good game but u cant have big huge battles like in supreme commande, thats the only reason why i like supreme commander a little more.
i hated the game too...i thought the graphics were bad...im not going to lie bout my rig, its a 7600gt so it plays on medium,but really i dont care about graphics the gameplay was bad for me.
Is this your second RTS?? Crap graphics and sound? The graphics are pretty decent, not superb but good. I am not big on sound, so I really have not payed attention to it. I also take it english isn%26#39;t your first language. The second part of the sentence doesn%26#39;t make too much sense. Anyways, I don%26#39;t see how you can judge a RTS based off from graphics and sound. Go play C%26C3, it has decent sound and graphics, lots of actions, and all the shallow gameplay you are looking for.
anyone that says sup com has bad sound is crazy. I don%26#39;t think any RTS game to date has as good a musical score as sup com does. One thing that is lacking in sup com are the textures for units and buildings. Things such as land and especially water look amazing, but the textures look a little low on the units. Hopefully someone releases a patch to make the resolution on units and building textures higher.
I can infer that you have only played 1 RTS in your life or your a 9-12 year old who thinks your opinion is the only one that matters.
I had more fun playing Supreme Commander over Tiberium Wars, but either way World In Conflict > All.
I didnt like it because all the factions were the same and only had a few differences aside from the looks
I just got command and conquer and I am having loads of fun, check that one out, you will undoubtebly enjoy!
No comments:
Post a Comment