battlefield 2 creams counter-strike series

I never played a game where u were so bunched up, where ppl are always blocking u, team mates always flashing and blinding u. Then u have the enemy that throws flashes, so most of the time ur blinded.. the maps are so tiny ur bunched.. Like dust theyre like only 3 main ways to the sites and ppl just camp them or just massive rush 1 spot. I mean the idea of cs is good but wow, jusy the same thing over and over. The people never change strats, I wish u were able to run through ppl... Why have barrels in counter-strike? they block u! they roll and stop u from moving, the guns are so unbalanced it pisses me off. The awp tkaes no skill what so ever. U shoot any part of the body they die. Then the maps are basically so tiny they shouldnt even have that powerful of a gun. Ive see hs from m4 go dink with sparks not kill as fast an AK. SO the AK are so much stronger than the m4.  I never played such an unbalanced game before. Where in bf2, u have flashes but ppl dont do all the time. You have so many possibilities on karkland or anyother map it just gets to be so much fun. CS either A or b pick b tunnels or mid to b, or go short a or long a. Or like most poeple just camp cuz most of the servers are with 30-60 people where the game was meant to be only 5-5 or maybe 6-6. Ive also noticed in bf2 me and a sniper both hsed each other. To the morons that will say but its impossible to do so, wrong its possible. In real life, If i pulled the trigger and u pulled the trigger at the same time guess what? The bullets fly at the sametime and hit eachother. Ive gotten killed and killed the other shooter. In css, It never has happened ever! It even has happened in rainbow six, I ve noticed in css the guns kinda take turns with the bullets. Ive also said for years the hitboxes were messed up, what i mean here is that u would get hit even if u went beyond the wall for the enemy not to have a sight on u.

It turns out that the hitboxes are like 2-5 yards behind your body, another valve is just horrible  at protecting cs. They should be hung for this. They turned out to be just like EA games, they only care about money now. They always promote games on steam and buying all of these free mods and charging us from them which is bs in my opinion. I wanted to see how many hacks css and cs had, they had somewhere in the thousands, where bf2 had maybe uhhh 30? and the 30 were all detected. CSS were never detected. It upsets me when a company doesnt back up their games, they say theyre protecting the servers lol. What kinda company doesnt see the video of the hacker hacking and doesnt ban them? They say they need the machine to detect them??? If u have a user submit a video of someone cheating u ban them to lower the cheaters and u get more money. Honestly, I like the idea of cs I really do. I just dont like how many hackers are in the game and how they get away from it. I dont like how they are so cheap to let them do it from building a machine to detect this crap. Punkbuster is 1 cookie to crack, I would admit I hacked a couple of times in bf2 against friend not real real servers, and punkbuster actuallys in 1-3 weeks wills detect u. I just dont see how css is so big, its a decent layout of maps but to small and cramped up with alot of noobs using the awp. So many items like barrels that block u and with users blinding u and blocking u. I%26#39;m hoping with dx10 with all of these games coming out a company will actually care in their product and make something worthly. battlefield 2 creams counter-strike series
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]battlefield 2 creams counter-strike series
Biggest load of crap I%26#39;ve read in awhile. There%26#39;s so much to pick apart it%26#39;s not even funny. 1) I%26#39;m never flashed by my teammates. Looks like you should get new ones. 2) It seems like you%26#39;ve never used a keyboard before. The thing is, you can strafe, or even *gasp* jump over people or objects. Honestly, this is the weirdest problem I%26#39;ve ever heard of and you%26#39;re the only one with it.3) ''Boo hoo, the Awp takes no skill''? You suck, get better at the game.4) Battlefield 2 is a bland game. It doesn%26#39;t feel very fluid, there%26#39;s a lot of traveling and not as much killing, horrible netcode, artillery, ect.5) Most servers aren%26#39;t 30-60 people. In fact, I%26#39;ve only seen 5 servers with more than 60 people in the past month of playing. You don%26#39;t HAVE to join servers with lots of people. Did you know that? The game wasn%26#39;t made for 30-60 people.6) Another testament to your intelligence is the Sniper story. In real life, it%26#39;s possible to hit eachother at the same time of course, but here%26#39;s the thing, you%26#39;d have to pull the trigger within the same milisecond as your enemy. Seems a bit rediculous. And who even cares?7) The hitboxes are great. Better than they have ever been. BF2 on the other hand has questionable hitboxes (or atleast times where my bullets disappear)8 ) Odd....i%26#39;ve never seen a hacker in Counter-Strike Source before. I%26#39;ve played since beta, and the only two hackers I%26#39;ve seen were friends of mine just messing around. What%26#39;s the point of hacking in a crappy game like BF2 anyways?9) All the hackers you have seen have been banned. Vac is smart, and flags people so someone doesn%26#39;t get banned instantly and say ''Hey, quick, don%26#39;t use this hack!'', so all the hackers will play with the hack and they all will get the banstick. 10) Punkbuster has been a joke, and always has been. It%26#39;s a hassle and surprisingly uses system resources to check for updates in intervals of 30 seconds. In conclusion, you suck at Counter-Strike, and since you can%26#39;t seem to get good, you whine about it instead. Bravo?
And Battlefield 1942 creams Battlefield 2.
First rule of internet foruming: Don%26#39;t listen to Battlefield 2 players when they bash Counter-Strike.
[QUOTE=''MisfitsDanzing''] I never played a game where u were so bunched up, where ppl are always blocking u, team mates always flashing and blinding u. Then u have the enemy that throws flashes, so most of the time ur blinded.. the maps are so tiny ur bunched.. Like dust theyre like only 3 main ways to the sites and ppl just camp them or just massive rush 1 spot. I mean the idea of cs is good but wow, jusy the same thing over and over. The people never change strats, I wish u were able to run through ppl... Why have barrels in counter-strike? they block u! they roll and stop u from moving, the guns are so unbalanced it pisses me off. The awp tkaes no skill what so ever. U shoot any part of the body they die. Then the maps are basically so tiny they shouldnt even have that powerful of a gun. Ive see hs from m4 go dink with sparks not kill as fast an AK. SO the AK are so much stronger than the m4.  I never played such an unbalanced game before. Where in bf2, u have flashes but ppl dont do all the time. You have so many possibilities on karkland or anyother map it just gets to be so much fun. CS either A or b pick b tunnels or mid to b, or go short a or long a. Or like most poeple just camp cuz most of the servers are with 30-60 people where the game was meant to be only 5-5 or maybe 6-6. Ive also noticed in bf2 me and a sniper both hsed each other. To the morons that will say but its impossible to do so, wrong its possible. In real life, If i pulled the trigger and u pulled the trigger at the same time guess what? The bullets fly at the sametime and hit eachother. Ive gotten killed and killed the other shooter. In css, It never has happened ever! It even has happened in rainbow six, I ve noticed in css the guns kinda take turns with the bullets. Ive also said for years the hitboxes were messed up, what i mean here is that u would get hit even if u went beyond the wall for the enemy not to have a sight on u.

It turns out that the hitboxes are like 2-5 yards behind your body, another valve is just horrible  at protecting cs. They should be hung for this. They turned out to be just like EA games, they only care about money now. They always promote games on steam and buying all of these free mods and charging us from them which is bs in my opinion. I wanted to see how many hacks css and cs had, they had somewhere in the thousands, where bf2 had maybe uhhh 30? and the 30 were all detected. CSS were never detected. It upsets me when a company doesnt back up their games, they say theyre protecting the servers lol. What kinda company doesnt see the video of the hacker hacking and doesnt ban them? They say they need the machine to detect them??? If u have a user submit a video of someone cheating u ban them to lower the cheaters and u get more money. Honestly, I like the idea of cs I really do. I just dont like how many hackers are in the game and how they get away from it. I dont like how they are so cheap to let them do it from building a machine to detect this crap. Punkbuster is 1 cookie to crack, I would admit I hacked a couple of times in bf2 against friend not real real servers, and punkbuster actuallys in 1-3 weeks wills detect u. I just dont see how css is so big, its a decent layout of maps but to small and cramped up with alot of noobs using the awp. So many items like barrels that block u and with users blinding u and blocking u. I%26#39;m hoping with dx10 with all of these games coming out a company will actually care in their product and make something worthly. [/QUOTE]  Wrong, Care to try again?Please deposit 25 Cent%26#39;s 10..9..8..7..6..5..4..3..2..1 Game Over
bf2 is great for casuals. But after you sink a couple hundred hours into one of the games, css will still be fun to play, Bf2 isnt.
[QUOTE=''GodLovesDead''] 4) Battlefield 2 is a bland game. It doesn%26#39;t feel very fluid, there%26#39;s a lot of traveling and not as much killing, horrible netcode, artillery, ect.5) Most servers aren%26#39;t 30-60 people. In fact, I%26#39;ve only seen 5 servers with more than 60 people in the past month of playing. You don%26#39;t HAVE to join servers with lots of people. Did you know that? The game wasn%26#39;t made for 30-60 people.6) Another testament to your intelligence is the Sniper story. In real life, it%26#39;s possible to hit eachother at the same time of course, but here%26#39;s the thing, you%26#39;d have to pull the trigger within the same milisecond as your enemy. Seems a bit rediculous. And who even cares?7) The hitboxes are great. Better than they have ever been. BF2 on the other hand has questionable hitboxes (or atleast times where my bullets disappear)10) Punkbuster has been a joke, and always has been. It%26#39;s a hassle and surprisingly uses system resources to check for updates in intervals of 30 seconds.[/QUOTE]Seems that you didnt play BF2 either...2) Battlefield is fluid... If your rig doesnt support it, too bad... but I get an average 40-45 fps with everything maxed out (and my rig isnt top of the line). Of course there is lots of traveling, after all, you are playing IN A BATTLEFIELD, and you have vehicles and different spawn points, so unless you are playing on an I/O server, youre not supposed to walk that much. On the other hand, CS maps are somewhat smaller because in theory, a TERRORIS situation is handled on a very limited location. I wont argue with you about the netcode, youre right on that one. And whats the problem with the artillery? Youre playing as a member of an army, so the artillery feels right at home there.5) If you only found 5 servers with 30-60 players in the last month, you obviously dont know how to use the server browser or youre searching for very specific servers. And yes, the game was made for up to 64 players (looks like you never played on a full server with a good team)6) The sniper story: it is not unusual to die like that, but of course, it happens by pure luck (or bad luck).7) Questionable boxes?? What are you talking about?? If you hit an enemy on the head, it dies instantly, on any other part of the body it takes from 3 to 6 shots to kill the enemy. Your bullets cant dissapear (or, you are the only player in BF2 whose bullets dissapear). Remember that the weapons on BF2 have some heavy recoil, so its possible that on full auto you will miss your target even at close range10) Punkbuster... It sure is a pain in the butt, but you can use the pb_sleep command (i think that was the command) to make PB to let more time pass between checks.Make no mistake, its not my intention to be rude or something, but CS and BF are 2 diff games. I really dont care what people say from CS because I only played it a little bit and never liked it. But I hate when people say things with no sense regarding BF
I enjoy CS:S more.  I like the smaller scale person to person combat; no vehicles.  The best games to me are 5-10 people/per team and 10 is pushing it.  I think the buying system adds an nice element to the game too.  You have be good with a number of weapons and you%26#39;re always on the lookout for someting better laying on the ground. Now, CS isn%26#39;t the most realistic game out there but realism doesn%26#39;t necessarily translate into fun IMO.
[QUOTE=''Manly-manly-man'']You are stupid. Don%26#39;t play in stupid servers. You have obviously never played an organized match before...[/QUOTE]  Cal-M Player, I just honestly think cs is garbage. Its a fun game... Like if u dumb as ses would read further in I said its a great game with scrimages with 5-5 and 6-6. Another... most of the stupid servers are fake with bots. I hate this, It drives me crazy. I gotta sit there and pick through some to make sure they have real players in there.
[QUOTE=''zero9167'']bf2 is great for casuals. But after you sink a couple hundred hours into one of the games, css will still be fun to play, Bf2 isnt.[/QUOTE] i actually.. really agree with this.. i%26#39;m not tired of cs yet.. and i%26#39;ve been playing for awhile..4 digit steam id yay. 
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
heres so video of hacks  http://youtube.com/watch?v=gHKP3n02hCchttp://youtube.com/watch?v=NiIku2UWW1o%26mode=related%26search=heres a video of the hitboxes.. now tell me if im wrogn and they give u the command on how to do this.http://youtube.com/watch?v=fdRpYaQA8cU%26mode=related%26search= 
Am I the only person who thinks that CSS is boring?I shot you. With a repetitive weapon. Dry, Rinse, Repeat.Where as Battlefield is a constantly changing...get this...Battlefield.You can fly and drive (assuming you spawn near your vehicle of choice) and continuously change the way you kill.In no way is that bland.How is it not fluid? I%26#39;m not even sure what your trying to say...
Battlefield is better than CS. No doubt. Alot of your points were pretty bad though. You said Karkland...booo.
hey dont compare cs to battlefield 2, cs rules, and battlefield 2 does so. they are totally different games. so dont bother about this thread. you can compare cs to css, or cs to team fortress, or cs to halflife.
[QUOTE=''Manly-manly-man'']You are stupid. Don%26#39;t play in stupid servers. You have obviously never played an organized match before...[/QUOTE] 100% true.
Misfits danzing, pass 4th grade english at least before you start trying to get a point across.
BF2 is the best multilayer FPS. Played CS really don%26#39;t get how these nerds can be so into it. Small maps, little people, 2 or 3 points of intersection, virtually no options, kill, die, and repeat. Absolutely no point of playing past a few hours.
Never agree with an argument that contains the word ''Noob'' in it somewhere.